Saturday, 27 September 2014

Civil Paedo Service?

Ok, I have this theory about the paedo's in power.
Over the past few months, I've discussed it with various friends and contacts and they all agree, it could hold a certain amount of water.....
The paedo activities within the UK have gone, for the most part, undetected for decades. That would probably involve a lot of file interception, fast talking and deals under the table.
The term civil service can refer to either a branch of governmental service in which individuals are employed (hired) on the basis of professional merit as proven by competitive examinations; or the body of employees in any government agency apart from the military, which is a separate extension of any national government.civil servant or public servant is a person in the public sector employed for a government department or agency. The extent of civil servants of a state as part of the "civil service" varies from country to country. In the United Kingdom, for instance, only Crown (national government) employees are referred to as civil servants whereas county or city employees are not.[....]
An international civil servant or international staff member is a civilian employee that is employed by an intergovernmental organization.[1] These international civil servants do not resort under any national legislation (from which they have immunity of jurisdiction) but are governed by an internal staff regulations. All disputes related to international civil service are brought before special tribunals created by these international organizations such as, for instance, the Administrative Tribunal of the ILO.Specific referral can be made to the International Civil Service Commission (ICSC) of the United Nations, an independent expert body established by the United Nations General Assembly. Its mandate is to regulate and coordinate the conditions of service of staff in the United Nations common system, while promoting and maintaining high standards in the international civil service. [....]The civil service in the United Kingdom only includes Crown (i.e. central government) employees, not parliamentary employees or local government employees.Source
So Civil Servants are Central Government employees that have worked their way up through a departmental sector and have reached the pinnacle of their career. They have become adept at oiling the cogs and the quirky "pause and squeeze" as they shake the hand they just greased is more than likely reciprocated in true "Old boys network" style.
They have learned to keep their mouth shut if they don't like what they see (and if they do!) and they keep the Country going, behind the scenes.

Those Employed by ParliamentThe first category of public body is comprised of Parliament itself, and the bodies which report direct to Parliament, including the National Audit Office, the Parliamentary Ombudsman and the Electoral Commission. Constitutionally, employees of these bodies are not servants of the Crown and they are therefore not civil servants.
 Civil Servants 
The second category of public body is comprised mainly of those who work for Government departments which report to Ministers (who are of course always Parliamentarians).

If you are a new recruit, arriving on your first day, you will first meet support staff (or ‘administrative staff’) in reception areas, delivering papers, and so on. They also carry out routine casework and provide direct support for senior staff. They are very important, not only because nothing would function without them, but also because they see more clearly than anyone else what is going on. If you want to know whether a unit is well run, and provides a good service to its customers, you will generally get a better informed, and more honest, answer from support staff.Next up the chain are middle management (or ‘executive grades’). They help formulate and amend policy; deal with more difficult casework and help Ministers respond to letters from the public. A small number of them are in the ‘fast stream’ – serving a three to five year apprenticeship before being promoted to (what used to be called) Grade 7 and then into the Senior Civil Service. [...]
 What do these senior people do? They help Ministers and other officials deliver Ministers’ objectives, both by giving advice to Ministers and by implementing Ministers’ decisions. They need to be able to work closely and effectively with Ministers, with other Whitehall civil servants, with the wider civil service, with the private and voluntary sectors and with pressure groups. They operate more like a club than a hierarchical organisation – and that is simultaneously their great strength and their great weakness – a subject to which I return later.
The key grade is Grade 7. Grade 7s are expected to know all there is to know about their policy area, and to know all the key players, pressure groups and so on. In a well run department, you will find that senior officials listen very carefully to their Grade 7s, and tend to operate in a way which supports their Grade 7s, rather than vice versa. [...]
 There are around 3700 people in the Senior Civil Service (SCS), including many outside Whitehall, many specialists and many who first worked in other sectors. Indeed, the long term aim is to have around one-third of the SCS recruited from outside the civil service. SCS jobs vary hugely, but usually include one or more of the following:
  • agreeing strategic aims with Ministers, and communicating those aims to Grade 7s and others;
  • agreeing and providing the financial and human resources needed to achieve those aims;
  • deploying their greater knowledge and experience in support of Grade 7s;
  • trouble-shooting;
  • undertaking complex casework and project management, and
  • acting as a personal adviser to Ministers, of whom more below
The breadth of responsibilities increases with increasing grade, but it is seldom necessary for there to be a Grade 5 and a Grade 3 and a Grade 2 between the key Grade 7 and the Permanent Secretary/Head of Department. Most departments structure themselves so as to cut out one of these tiers (but not always the same one) in each management hierarchy.It is worth noting that the more senior officials are not necessarily more powerful. They have to rely on others both for information and for delivery, and they are often heavily constrained by (small p) political factors, including the independence of each Secretary of State, and hence the independence of each departmental senior management team. Other constraints on senior officials include the need to avoid annoying Ministers, and the club-like nature of senior officialdom. [...]

They advise the Ministers who then write the basics of a policy. This then gets passed back to the Civil Servant who fills in all the details whilst the Minister advises the Government on said policy (that's still being drafted). 

So essentially, the Civil Servants advise the Ministers, who advise the MP, who then advise the PM..... Please feel free to correct me if you feel my surmettre to be incorrect.
That makes, does it not, the "fat controller" the one that has occupied the same office for the past 20-30 years?

So why is nobody looking at these people?

Saturday, 6 September 2014

Child Abuse Investigations In UK

In the light of the announcement of the new Head of the National Inquiry into how authorities handled the reporting of Child Abuse, I bring you the list of current ongoing investigations around the UK and ask, why does Thereasa May think the Lord Mayor of London appropriate to deal with this?
Fiona Woolf has knowledge of the Energy sector. She would have served better on the Fracking Inquiry rather than a delicate subject she knows nothing about.

An indepth look into CSA that will "possibly take up to two years."
Operation Pallial said maybe five years for an investigation into just North Wales.

How many more months before the Inquiry has working Terms of Reference in place?

Child abuse inquiries and investigations

Independent inquiry
The Government announced on 7 July 2014 an independent inquiry to investigate the way public bodies handled child sex abuse claims. Former judge, Elizabeth Butler-Sloss, who led the Cleveland child abuse inquiry in the late 1980s, was originally chosen to head the inquiry, but she stepped down following concerns about her family links. The new chairman has not yet been named. The inquiry is not expected to report before the 2015 general election.
Home Office review
NSPCC chief executive Peter Wanless is to lead a review into Home Office handling of historical child sex abuse allegations and the way police and prosecutors dealt with any information given to them. This follows a call from Labour MP Simon Danczukto explain why written allegations about powerful paedophiles - presented in the 1980s to Leon Brittan when he was home secretary - have since disappeared. A Home Office review last year of allegations concerning child abuse from 1979-99 resulted in four files, not previously disclosed, being passed to police. But the review found no evidence of specific allegations of abuse by prominent public figures.
Cyril Smith/Rochdale
Two investigations - by Greater Manchester Police (GMP) and Rochdale Council. On 7 July 2014, GMP said it was considering widening its inquiry into claims of a cover-up involving paedophile abuse at Knowl View School, Rochdale, in the 1980s and 1990s. It said Rochdale Council had agreed to suspend its own inquiry while it considered how to proceed.
Savile NHS inquiry
It found Jimmy Savile sexually assaulted victims aged five to 75 between 1962 and 2009 in 28 hospitals, including Broadmoor and Leeds General Infirmary. Reports at several other hospitals, including Stoke Mandeville, have been delayed.
Dept for Education
Headed by human rights lawyer Lucy Scott-Moncrieff to look at allegations Savile abused children inschools and children's homes, from the 1960s to 1980s. Aims to report summer 2014.
Savile BBC inquiry
Dame Janet Smith is investigating whether culture and practice at the BBC enabled Savile to carry out abuse of children unchecked - due to report summer 2014.
Operation Yewtree
Police investigation into Savile and others. An investigation by the Metropolitan Police and NSPCC reported in January 2013 on allegations against Savile. Cases which emerged as a result of investigations into Savile, but were unconnected to him, included Max Clifford and Rolf Harris. Investigations into other suspects are continuing.
Operation Fairbank/
Operation Fairbank was a "scoping exercise" by the Met Police to establish whether there was sufficient evidence for a formal inquiry. Operation Fernbridge was subsequently launched in Feb 2013 to investigate allegations about a paedophile network linked to Parliament and Number 10 centred on Elm Guest House in south-west London.Operation Cayacos is investigating allegations of a paedophile ring linked to convicted paedophile Peter Righton.
Pallial inquiry
Investigating allegations of historical abuse between 1953-95 at children's homes in North Wales. Also Mrs Justice Macur appointed by PM to review the 2000 Waterhouse inquiry into North Wales abuse dating back to the 1970s.
Historical Institutional Abuse
(Northern Ireland)
Set up to establish if there were systemic failingsby institutions or the state in their duties towards children in their care between 1922-95.
Operation Garford, Suffolk
Investigating historical abuse allegations centred on Kesgrave Hall School from the 1970s to the 1990s. Results of the original investigation, carried out in 1992, are being reviewed. Suffolk police are carrying out two further, unconnected investigations into allegations of abuse at two other schools.
Jersey care inquiry
Investigating historical abuse claims in Jersey's care system from 1960 to present day, begins 22 

Tuesday, 2 September 2014

Charges Against Napier

Got to love the CPS comments at the end. How could any info now put out possibly taint prosecution? We all Know he's guilty.

Charles Napier to face 21 charges of child sexual abuse

Baljit Ubhey, Chief Crown Prosecutor for CPS London, said:
"We have carefully considered the evidence gathered by the Metropolitan Police Service in relation to allegations concerning Charles Napier, a teacher at the time of the alleged offending between 1968 and 1973.
“Having completed our review, we have concluded there is sufficient evidence and it is in the public interest for Mr Napier to be charged with 21 offences of indecent assault. These date from 1968 to 1973, and relate to 21 male complainants aged between eight and 13 at the time of the alleged offending and who were pupils at the school where he taught."
The charges are:
1.       One charge of indecent assault on a boy aged 11 - 13 between 1968 and 1970
2.       One charge of indecent assault on a boy aged 11 between 1969 and 1970
3.       One charge of indecent assault on a boy aged 11 – 12 between 1969 and 1970
4.       One charge of indecent assault on a boy aged 11 – 13 between 1969 and 1972
5.       One charge of indecent assault on a boy aged 11 – 12 between 1969 and 1970
6.       One charge of indecent assault on a boy aged 9 – 11 between 1970 to 1972
7.       One charge of indecent assault on a boy aged 8 or 9 in 1970
8.       One charge of indecent assault on a boy aged 9 – 11 between 1969 and 1972
9.       One charge of indecent assault on a boy aged 9 or 10 between 1969 and 1970
10.   One charge of indecent assault on a boy aged 10 to 13 between 1969 and 1972
11.   One charge of indecent assault on a boy aged 13 in 1970
12.   One charge of indecent assault on a boy aged 9 – 12 between 1969 and 1972
13.   One charge of indecent assault on a boy aged 8 in 1971
14.   One charge of indecent assault on a boy aged 11 – 13 between 1969 and 1972
15.   One charge of indecent assault on a boy aged 8 or 9 – 12 between 1969 and 1972
16.   One charge of indecent assault on a boy aged 8 – 9 between 1969 and 1970
17.   One charge of indecent assault on a boy aged 11 – 13 between 1969 and 1971
18.   One charge of indecent assault on a boy aged 10 – 13 between 1969 and 1972
19.   One charge of indecent assault on a boy aged 12 in 1971
20.   One charge of indecent assault on a boy aged 8 – 12 between 1969 and 1973
21.   One charge of indecent assault on a boy aged 8 between 1969 and 1970
Ms Ubhey said:
"The decision to prosecute has been taken in accordance with the Code for Crown Prosecutors and Crown Prosecution Service legal guidance on rape and child sexual abuse. We have determined that there is sufficient evidence for a realistic prospect of conviction and that a prosecution is in the public interest.
"Mr Napier will appear at Westminster Magistrates' Court on 2 September 2014. 
"May I remind all concerned that Mr Napier has a right to a fair trial. It is extremely important that there should be no reporting, commentary or sharing of information online which could in any way prejudice these proceedings.”